Toggle Menu
傳單
Competitive Comparison
Signal Analyzers: Keysight MXA vs. Rohde & Schwarz FSV1
Wireless systems, parts, and subsystems must meet stringent standards. For modulation analysis measurements, troubleshooting, and locating transient or other time-varying signals, the most important parameter to consider when selecting a signal analyzer is maximum analysis bandwidth at the highest carrier frequency required. For wireless emissions measurements, consider frequency range, phase noise, third order intercept, sensitivity and measurement applications, See how the MXA compares to the FSV in each of these categories.
Keysight N9020B MXA signal analyzer at a glance
Excellent capabilities
–Multi-touch user interface
–Phase noise
–Modulation quality
–Measurement speed
–Sensitivity
–ACPR dynamic range
Ready-to-use software
–Simplified measurement routines
–Pass/fail tests, characterization, or troubleshooting
–Parametric to standards-compliant
–Download free software trial at
www.keysight.com/find/free_trials
Future-ready
–Field-upgradeable
–Upgrade CPU, memory, drives
Consistent framework
–Same UI across all X-series
–Same programming commands
Advanced accessories
–Smart pre-amplifier to 50 GHz
–Smart noise source (SNS)
The MXA, the optimum choice for taking new-generation wireless devices to market, has the flexibility to quickly adapt to evolving test requirements, today and tomorrow.
Reducing analyzer noise floor
NFE works very well with noise-like signals, such as digital communications signals, which already require substantial averaging to reduce the variance of the result. The plot to the right shows that the input signal can be more than 9 dB lower with NFE than without, while still assuring that the added amplitude uncertainty due to instrument noise is less than 1 dB.
×
請銷售人員與我聯絡。
*Indicates required field
感謝您！
A sales representative will contact you soon.
