DS2101A Inspector Fault Injection

DS2101A Inspector Fault Injection helps security teams automate complex fault injection campaigns, coordinate diverse test hardware, and efficiently identify fault conditions that may expose security vulnerabilities.

Supporting voltage, clock, electromagnetic, and laser fault injection workflows, Inspector provides a common software environment for configuring attack parameters, controlling hardware, executing campaigns, and analyzing results. AI-assisted parameter exploration helps teams navigate complex test spaces more efficiently, while cryptographic analysis capabilities support deeper investigation of successful faults and their potential security impact.

• Automate complex fault injection campaigns to reduce repetitive manual testing and improve evaluation efficiency.
• Support multiple fault injection methodologies, including Voltage Fault Injection (VFI), Clock Fault Injection (CFI), Electromagnetic Fault Injection (EMFI), and Laser Fault Injection (LFI).
• Explore large fault parameter spaces efficiently using AI-assisted parameter exploration to accelerate vulnerability discovery.
• Coordinate fault injection hardware through a unified environment for more consistent and repeatable testing workflows.
• Configure single and double fault injection scenarios to support increasingly advanced security evaluations.
• Perform cryptographic Differential Fault Analysis (DFA) for AES, DES, and RSA CRT implementations.
• Identify fault-sensitive behavior and successful attack conditions using dedicated analysis capabilities, including Unique Data Analysis and FI Spotlight.
• Integrate hardware tooling for workflows involving IC Waves, Transceiver, XYZ Calibration, and Camera functionality.
• Improve repeatability and scalability by managing test configuration, execution, and analysis within a structured software workflow.
• Validate security countermeasures by systematically testing device behavior across different fault conditions and parameter combinations.
• Support certification preparation and security validation through consistent, documented, and repeatable evaluation workflows.
• Scale from targeted experiments to larger automated campaigns as evaluation requirements become more complex.