Starting Download..
save Save

Impedance Measurement Uncertainty when Measuring Low Impedance Devices at Low Frequency

For this low frequency and impedance application, the impedance analyzer would provide more accurate measurement results using its I-V technique, compared to the reflection method used by the vector network analyzer (VNA). As a rule-of-thumb, the VNA generally can provide reasonably accurate results over an impedance range that is a factor of 10x (or x/10) of the system's characteristic impedance, Z0. For example, for Z0= 50 ohms, the impedance range would be 5 ohms to 500 ohms. However, for best measurement accuracy, the DUT's impedance should not vary by more than 3 to 5 ohms from Z0.

DUT Characteristics

ZL= 3 ohms ( Note: a 2-port device is assumed)

Reflection coefficient , r = [ZL - Z0]/[ ZL + Z0] = -47/53 = -0.887 (~ -0.9)

Note: The negative sign indicates that the phase characteristic is much like that of a short.

S11/Return Loss (RL) = 1.04 dB

SWR = 16.7 :1

Insertion Loss: unknown/not specified

From its reflection (magnitude) uncertainty curve (page 9, 1-port calibration), a DUT with an S11 (r ) of 0.9 (linear) results in a reflection measurement uncertainty of +/- 0.025 (linear). Even though this graph assumes S21 = S12 = 0, this assumption can be applied here, since the DUT reflects 90% of the incident signal, with the other 10% being transmitted and re-reflected by the receiver's (uncorrected) 18 dB load match. This re-reflected signal is very small compared to the true DUT reflected signal, and therefore may be neglected. However, for best reflection measurement accuracy, it is recommended that:

1) The output of the DUT be terminated with a precision 50-ohm load rather than being connected to the 8712ET's transmission port or,

2) If the DUT output is to be connected to the 8712ET's transmission port, install a precision pad/attenuator to the transmission port to improve its "effective" load match.

Given the above, the impedance and return loss measurement uncertainties are estimated as follows:

1) D S11 (dB) = R.L. meas. uncert (dB)= -20 log (1 + 0.025)= - 0.214dB and,

-20 log (1 - 0.025)= + 0.22 dB

R.L. measure measurment uncertainty = 1.04 dB, +0.22 dB, -0.214 dB

2) ZL = Z0 (1 + r )/(1- r ) , where ZL = measured impedance, Z0 = 50 ohms, r = reflection coefficient

ZL High = 50 [1 + (-0.887 + 0.025)]/[1 - (-0.887 + 0.025)] = 50 (0.138/1.86) = 3.71 ohms

ZL Low = 50 [1 + (-0.887 - 0.025)]/[1- (-0.887 - 0.025)] = 50 (0.088/1.912) = 2.30 ohms

Therefore, the impedance measurement uncertainty is ZL = 3 ohms, +0.71 ohms, -0.70 ohms.

Was this helpful?


Didn't find what you're looking for?